Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote

[Tinny Ng]

According to your summary of count, if we count committers votes only,
then we don't have any vetos, but we also don't have enough 3 binding +1
votes.  If we count all users' votes, we have enough 3 +1 votes, but then
there are -1s as well ....

Anyway, I think Jason's suggestion sounds good.  Put the source tar in the
experimental folder and let people play with it for a couple of months.
Set a deadline for testing period.  If no complaints, then put into CVS
later after the deadline ....

Tinny

Murray Cumming wrote:

> Tinny Ng wrote:
>
> > If there is any veto, and if you disagree
> > with the veto, you should lobby the person who cast the veto.  Until
> > all vetos are resolved, then we can move on from there.
> >
> > Tinny
>
> Are there any vetos?
> == Are there any -1s from committers?
>
> --
> Murray Cumming
> www.murrayc.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]