"Jason E. Stewart" wrote: > > I believe that Tinny indicated that since he opened the vote to all > developers, *any* -1 vote is a veto. Just so you know, Tinny is probably too shy to mention it but you should have written: I believe that Tinny indicated that since SHE opened the vote to all developers, *any* -1 vote is a veto. Nope, this is not a male only project. :-) -- Arnaud Le Hors - IBM, XML Standards Strategy Group / W3C AC Rep. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
