Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > SAXParser as of now doesn't provide any way of instantiating it with custom > parser configuration. I dont think why SAXParser can't be used for user defined
You're absolutely right. This was an oversight. We should also consider removing the constructors that allow the parsers to be constructed with a GrammarPool until we have properly designed and implemented the grammar caching facility. But for now I have left them in. -- Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
