Andy Clark wrote: > I can't say that I like your suggestion. Why would you add > position information to the QName? Is it so that you would > not have to change the method prototype?
that is exactly true - it more of hack that general solution to allow me to pass information about position of start/end tag through pipeline... > However, in relation to enhancing the pipeline itself, we > have been discussing how we can augment the pipeline with > additional information. See the thread titled "[Xerces2] > InfoSet Augmentations in XNI" that was posted on September > 20th. using XMLInfoSet and some feature such as "track-tag-positons" to trigger putting into XMLInfoSet map start/end positions (i guess it would be like hashtable?) > The original discussion was trying to address how we are > going to pass Post Schema Validation Information (PSVI) in > the XNI pipeline. However, my suggestion was to provide a > generic facility to add information to the pipeline. that would be great! alek --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
