Petr Kuzel wrote: > Yes, parameter entities. My scanner can then generate an additional info > without a need for private interface.
What extra information. I don't see a problem with adding augmentations to the other handlers -- I'm just curious as to what additional DTD information you'd like to pass along. > Once in history I even thought about a method augment(Augmentations) > that could be called prior particular handler callback if needed. > Later pipe components must propagate it in same manner. It is alternative > approach to the extra parameter. Unfortunately it may complicate logic. This is a bad idea because there's no way to guarantee that the two separate callbacks can be associated together. Since the parser is configured as a pipeline of separate components, there may be components later in the pipeline that add or remove method calls. Then the augmentations passed separately are no longer in sync. > > public void setValues(String value, String nonNormalizedValue); > > It is an interface so I would keep method count as low as possible. > -1 Okay. Do you want to submit a patch to fix this problem? -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
