Petr Kuzel wrote: > Those that are hidden by DTD scanner i.e. parameter entities > in markup. As I said I can live without it, as I will need to > rewrite scanner. I can create a side channel, but then appears > problems with synchronization.
It's certainly open to discussion. I thought at the beginning that *all* of the XNI handlers should be modified to allow augmentations to be passed along. So I would vote to add the augmentations. > > Okay. Do you want to submit a patch to fix this problem? > > Already done, even twice. It's really tiny one. > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5745 No, I meant going through *all* of the source every place that the method is called to ensure that the parser's behavior remains consistent. That is the patch I'm looking for. :) -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
