[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As I was posting the new binaries, I noticed once again that Xerces-J 1.4.4
> is still posted right alongside the Xerces2 packages. Now I don't think we
> should remove it; but what would people think about demoting it to the
> oldXerces1 subdirectory?
The archives should stay as they are so that users
always have access to old versions. However, I would
suggest the following:
1) Rename xerces-j/ directory to xerces1-j so
that it stays in line with our xerces2-j
naming convention; and
2) Add symbolic link for xerces2-j with the
name xerces-j. (Or you could move the dir
and make the link from xerces2-j to point
to xerces-j. Doesn't matter, really.)
The idea would be to transition the project back to
its original directory. However, so many people have
bookmarks to "xerces2-j/" that we still need that
around. Hence the link.
Watcha think?
--
Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
