Hi Alex, Thank you for submitting your test xml docs. I briefly tested your sample using XercesJ 1.4, the latest cvs extract, on a single processor win2k machine with the sun jdk 1.3 but was not able to reproduce the error. We will take a closer look at it next week.
Thanks, Neil. "Roytman, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/15/2001 03:36:34 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Neil Delima/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Xerces 1.4.1 Hello Neil, Thank you very much for your reply. I did not mean to complain, sorry if I sounded bitter. It was another bug/enhancement request (JAXP related) submitted by me which has been discussed but never addressed (I offered my help with it) and was sitting unopened for months. I understand that your resources are not bottomless. Do you think it might be a good idea to open bug and set its status (open/deferred/as designed/could not reproduce etc.) even if you can not work on it right now. I believe submitting bugs is important and it will help people to see what is going on with the bugs they submit. I wish I could post a patch but threading problems are very hard to debug for an outsider. The code sample I provided is quick and dirty test and yes I did not set error handler but the xml files I used should be valid. They have been in production with Xerces 1.2.x, ant then 1.3.x and whole infrastructure has been tested (with error handlers set of course) under heavy stress. In fact this the same little test works fine with version 1.3.1 I am using dual processor computer (might it make any difference?) Attached are xml file and dtd files. Please modify <!DOCTYPE SYSTEM Uri to match your file location Thank you very much in advance Alex -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: xerces 1.4.1 Hi Alex, I was testing your sample code for defect 1965 against XercesJ 1.4 and noticed that with an invalid xml, the same and not random errors were repeatedly reported a random number of times. Also noticed that you were not setting an error handler in your code. However was not able to reproduce this with a valid xml. Could you please send us a valid xml that causes this problem so that we can look into it? Thx, Neil "Roytman, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/14/2001 03:12:34 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: xerces 1.4.1 Hi Neil. How about bugs which has been reported months ago and nobody touched them at all ;-)? It even has sample code to reproduce the problem One bug I reported, is a real show stopper for migrating to from 1.3.1 to 1.4 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1965 - Xerces 1.4 DTD based validation erratic validation errors when parsing in multiple threads I think this bug might be related to another bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2186 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xerces 1.4.1 Hi Graham, How are you querying Bugzilla? There have been more than a dozen schema bugs reported (and mostly all fixed) there and the query feature works for us... As to your errors: If they haven't been reported yet, please file a bug in bugzilla. It'll get done faster if you supply a small test case that we can use to duplicate the problem, but it'll never get fixed at all if it hasn't been reported. :-) Cheers, Neil Neil Graham XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab Phone: 416-448-3519, T/L 778-3519 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Graham Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/14/2001 12:27:28 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: xerces 1.4.1 Hi, At 13/06/01 11:38 -0400 Wednesday, you wrote: >Hi folks, >Over the last few weeks, a number of bug fixes have been made in CVS, >primarily (but not exclusively) on Schema support. I'd like to propose >that we build/post a release next Friday, June 22, so that we can make >these fixes available. I for one would like to see this - is there a list of fixes to date? I've tried the querying Bugzilla, but that only reports a single bug for CVS (which has been resolved). (I ask this 'cause I built from CVS but the errors I'm seeing remain) Graham Mann Adobe Systems Europe Ltd. Tel: +44 (0)1603 226749 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (See attached file: nwind-schema.xml)(See attached file: xmap-schema.dtd) (See attached file: format.dtd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nwind-schema.xml
Description: Binary data
xmap-schema.dtd
Description: Binary data
format.dtd
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
