Yes, thanks, i understand what they are used for, my question was, how to we know not to describe them in the schema file?
Do we ignore all namespace declarations? But surely most qualified items are defined? So how come xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="foo.xsd" isn't? If this is just memorization, what is the list? if this is applying a rule, what is the rule? Quoting gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > The xsi is short for > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance > > and the varoious attribrutes are defined by the specification. Take a look > at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/ > > Cheers, > > Gareth > > > > Dave Brosius wrote: > > > There are a few nodes that are never represented in a schema definition, > > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > > > > and > > > > xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="foo.xsd" > > > > are two that come to mind. > > > > The question is, how do we humans know this? Did we memorize some list > > of nodes, or did we learn > > some rule to apply? > > > > -- > > Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing > > +44-1865-811184 http://blog.parthcomp.com/xerces > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
