On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:08 +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote: > 2008/5/7 Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > also its grossly inconvienient for doing large pages eg 101-200 - I > > would have to list 100 numbers in one big array !!!! > > It seems exclamation marks are for free today. > Are you complaining about putting 100 numbers in an array? > Are you implying that this is a performance problem? If you think it's > a userspace problem, then make a wrapper. > The API needs to be wrapped anyway, so this is no problem. The big > advantage here is that we have a powerful api with only a few > functions. In other words, we're keeping it simple. >
wrong you are creating big performance problems we need ranges in order to search efficiently - having potentially random hit IDs passe to that function means we cannot optimise (no way to tell in advance if its a range) Its so bad that we will add an extension GetPagedHits ourselves if no one else wants it! jamie _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
