2008/5/7 Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > we need ranges in order to search efficiently - having potentially > random hit IDs passe to that function means we cannot optimise (no way > to tell in advance if its a range) > > Its so bad that we will add an extension GetPagedHits ourselves if no > one else wants it!
You're seeing ghosts. It's trivial and very quick to check if a range of numbers is sequential. If it's sequential, you can use your optimized range function, if not, get the hits one by one. For the later you need a function anyway. Adding a proprietary extension over such a non-issue is rather sad. Cheers, Jos _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
