I absolutely agree. Actually I support the idea of having OSCAF taking care of NEPOMUK.
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 11:41 +0200, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > [replying to multiple concerns at once] > > On Tuesday 05 May 2009 12:16:13 Sebastian Faubel wrote: > > In my opinion NEPOMUK project has produced remarkable results. The name > > is known to many people and there has been a lot of marketing for it - i > > think of the nice logo icons on the soprano site.. ;) We should not > > throw that away. > > > > Personally, I think we should stick to the name and start working on > > existing tickets. I bet we'd get support from many people for this. > > Since there's movement towards the Semantic Desktop also on GNOME we > > need to maintain these desktop ontologies collaboratively. What's wrong > > with the oscaf repository Leo has created? > > That might be true for small projects that are producing code. (And even > those > need, as they grow, organisational backing). > > This is about maintaining and developing a standard set of ontologies to be > shared across different users / projects / applications / desktops. The OSCAF > foundation has been set up by NEPOMUK participants (KDE is among them) and > its > goals align with those of KDE. OSCAF as the keeper of these ontologies would > make a lot of sense in my books. > > That has of course nothing to do with technicalities such as hosting. IMO the > logo can still be used, it's very nice, it's visually not tied to NEPOMUK > (the > name) but to semantics (the concepts) and it's recognizable and beautiful.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
