2009/5/8 Evgeny Egorochkin <[email protected]>: > On 8 мая 2009 00:09:18 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: >> 2009/5/7 Evgeny Egorochkin <[email protected]>: >>> On 7 мая 2009 13:41:18 Roberto Guido wrote: ... >> I must admit that reading the pages on oscaf.org (organization and >> membership pages) leaves me a bit intimidated. And also leaves me >> questionable whether simply spinning off a vigilante sourceforge >> project will help collaboration... > > ...like the sourceforge project that Sebastian and Leo started already?
Yes. Although that depends and Sebastian and Leo's powers withing the OSCAF project. At this point I am still utterly in the dark on the decision making process withing OSCAF... > The point of this project is that repositories are open, and ticket tracker > is open which means that outsiders(as opposed to core maintainers) can > participate easily. Well, that depends on a lot of other things as well. But I will give them the benefit of the doubt :-) >> But I really am still puzzled about >> this whole oscaf deal. It seems that some people on the lists are into >> the inner workings behind this, perhaps they can enlighten everybody? > > Several researchers + a number of companies paying money to sustain the > foundation, showing an intent in implementing or using nepomuk tech and hoping > to have their voice heard. Although in practice you have a much better chance > of being heard if you provide useful suggestions as opposed to paying fees and > being silent ;) Again, I can't see what you base this claim on, but the benefit of the doubt wins again :-) -- Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
