On 6 июня 2009 19:18:37 Sebastian Faubel wrote: > Herewith I'd like to volunteer to assist in maintaining the NFO. Over > the last three years I have been working on a project that focuses on > efficient attribute based file management for storage abstraction in > Semantic Desktops. The results of this project will be published in > October this year and I'd like to propose the developed Ontology for > integration into NEPOMUK.
This is great news. Your input is much appreciated. > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 19:35 +0300, Evgeny Egorochkin wrote: > > On 4 июня 2009 19:18:22 Leo Sauermann wrote: > > > ok, now as we have agreed to merge and work together as one big group > > > of opensource/standardization folks, > > > > > > who is going to maintain/edit which ontology? > > > > > > using my feeling for ontology management and my open source experience, > > > I think we could need answers to some questions: > > > > > > as with every good project, I would like to know the names of people > > > who feel responsible to work for the quality. I would like to see an > > > ontology maintainer/editor for each ontology. > > > I would see this as role comparable to an open source project > > > administrator/maintainer, the one guy who reads the commits and kicks > > > butts when unit tests fail, etc. > > > Of course, it would be better to see two or three maintainers per > > > ontology, but lets start with one, or? > > > > > > to distribute work, it would be clever to have at least one maintainer > > > per ontology. > > > who of the previous posters feels responsible for which ontology? > > > > > > This is exactly as we have been doing it for the last three years, no > > > surprises here so far. > > > > > > up to today, this is the page with the maintainers names: > > > http://dev.nepomuk.semanticdesktop.org/wiki/OntologyMaintenance > > > > > > where do you think we should move this page to? > > > I thought both here: > > > http://www.oscaf.org/ontologies > > > and there: > > > http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/oscaf/ > > > > > > I volunteer to continue maintaining PIMO, > > > but as so many people are interested in NIE/NMO, NCO, NFO, NID3, > > > I would like to see someone from the Xesam guys to join here with > > > Antoni. so I step back maintaininng the NIE stack. > > > > > > afaik, phreedom could take my place there, that would be good. > > > > I'd gladly oversee the NIE stack. > > > > Having people with reasonable understanding of semantic tech and NIE and > > in- depth knowledge of a particular topic join to maintain this specific > > part is a good idea too. Indeed no surprises here :) > > > > > but since now move to xesam/freedesktop, I don't know where this should > > > be. I feel more home in TRAC, but am happy to learn something new. > > > Please give me an account and point me to the "welcome to freedesktop" > > > page explaining how things work, I only know the eclipse.org and sf.net > > > policies. > > > > > > Also I would like to get an account on the project management system we > > > are going to use and instructions how to file my tickets, I have a > > > backlog of one ticket for pimo: > > > https://dev.nepomuk.semanticdesktop.org/query?status=assigned&status=ne > > >w&st > > > atus=reopened&group=component&component=ontology-pimo&order=priority > > > > > > in the case freedesktop doesn't have anything like this, I would > > > propose to fall back to http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/oscaf/, as we > > > (phreedom, strueg, me) thought we will do back in february, but I would > > > guess it just takes time to learn how it works on freedesktop. > > > > freedesktop is a problem. We've got a bugzilla product at FDO, but we > > don't really have any control over it. It appears we can't import or > > export anything. > > > > Also FDO is very well known for taking a lot of time to process even > > trivial requests(such as adding a project). You can forget about > > infrastructure requests. > > > > So if we use FDO, we're stuck with a small set of software some of which > > is out of sync with reality(CVS) and to which we don't have a full > > access(such as for import/export). > > > > On the other hand we have semanticdesktop.org, sf.net and xesam.org > > > > FDO is nice as an idea, but the implementation is far from it. > > > > > curious to learn the itnerna there, > > > > > > best > > > Leo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nepomuk-kde mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.semanticdesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk-kde _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
