On Tuesday 16 June 2009 17:57:30 Evgeny Egorochkin wrote: > On 16 июня 2009 08:20:48 Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > I think this is a good solution. And keep in mind: we could go on > > discussing this forever and never get to work. Or we just do this now and > > if we at some later point see a better solution - we change it. After > > all, it is a free project. Thus, changing to another hosting service or > > version control service is no problem. > > > > Ok, so now we need to move over the ontology sources to the sf svn. > > Should we just import the current state of the ontologies into the svn? > > IMHO that would be enough. Just one folder for each ontology and maybe > > one for the tools around them should be enough. > > > > If we agree on that I could simply import it. > > If you can import/export issue tracker contents, then just do it. If not, > then I guess the only sane way out is to set up a Trac instance on > xesam.org which shouldn't be too much of a problem.
I thought we would use sf? Did I misunderstand? > Looks like discussions have already started and we should keep > documentation in one place... > > > On Monday 15 June 2009 14:11:21 Leo Sauermann wrote: > > > Ok, excellent, so now we decided to use TRAC+(svn|git) on sourceforge > > > because everyone can sign up there easily and we love the features of > > > TRAC. > > > > > > good, I have set this up already here (months ago) and it is ready to > > > use. Sebastian Trüg supported this idea back then and he is an admin > > > there also. > > > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/oscaf > > > > > > It carries the name OSCAF though, we intended to use this as "the > > > public space where anyone from the open source community can work on > > > the ontologies", > > > I changed the project description to reflect this: > > > "This project is used maintainers from open source projects to maintain > > > standards for the interoperability of desktop and web applications." > > > > > > Some of us have joined already, if this is it, send any of the admins > > > your sf-account name and the admins can add you there. > > > > > > best > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > It was Evgeny Egorochkin who said at the right time 12.06.2009 15:19 > > > the > > > > > > following words: > > > > On 11 июня 2009 16:45:45 Evgeny Egorochkin wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > >>> Does anyone know of a trac hosting solution that allows the admins > > > >>> to install plugins? Otherwise I vote for SF/trac/svn. (or > > > >>> SF/trac/git, and campaign for them to implement the trac/git > > > >>> integration in their offering). Or maybe freedesktop.org would > > > >>> allow this, i.e. a custom trac installation with the git plugin. > > > >> > > > >> So we can go with SF+svn and hope we'll be able to switch to git > > > >> shortly or we can try setting up trac on xesam.org... fdo.org, I > > > >> doubt it, but maybe someone else knows better. > > > > > > > > Talking to myself :) and maybe others. > > > > > > > > We should finally decide on something and get to doing some actual > > > > work. Lack of the issue tracker is stalling ontology development > > > > > > > > -- Evgeny > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xesam mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xesam mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
