On 11 июня 2009 08:29:16 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > 2009/6/11 Evgeny Egorochkin <[email protected]>: > > On 11 июня 2009 08:19:09 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > >> 2009/6/10 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[email protected]>: > >> > 2009/6/10 Sebastian Trüg <[email protected]>: > >> >> On Tuesday 09 June 2009 20:59:28 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > >> >>> As I was the one to take the "fight" with us getting Xesam up on > >> >>> feedesktop.org back in the days, I should probably say something > >> >>> about this... > >> >>> > >> >>> I don't think we should use the FDO infrastructure because of three > >> >>> things: 1) High barrier to entry for non-experts, 2) Extremely slow > >> >>> response time from sysadmins, 3) Very little flexibility. > >> >>> > >> >>> So we need a system that is the opposite of these three points. I > >> >>> think a combination of SF + an external we-own-it shell+web server > >> >>> is what we need. > >> >>> > >> >>> So what I propose: > >> >>> > >> >>> SF: > >> >>> svn > >> >>> trac > >> >>> > >> >>> Own server (under xesam.org or oscaf.org, I am indifferent where we > >> >>> mount it): Moin wiki > >> >>> SSH shell server > >> >>> Web server with public compiled ontologies (and possibly other > >> >>> stuff) > >> >>> > >> >>> Then there is the mailing list... I really don't care much here. > >> >> > >> >> This sounds perfect to me. I would even suggest to use > >> >> www.semanticdesktop.org instead of xesam.org since that is the > >> >> namespace of the ontologies anyway. + the tools are already in place > >> >> there. > >> > > >> > Sounds sane - who owns semanticdesktop.org? Whois says Stefan Decker > >> > of deri.org... > >> > > >> > Is it a hosting solution where we can create shell accounts for the > >> > involved maintainers? > >> > >> For those of you not following [email protected] - Aaron Seigo is > >> trying to rally people to use gitorious.org for spec hosting... Maybe > >> we should proactive and support his idea? > >> > >> Aaron says: > >> "...today i moved the embryonic git repository for xdg specifications to > >> gitorious.org: > >> > >> http://gitorious.org/xdg-specs/ > >> > >> it is owned by a team called "xdg-specs" > >> > >> http://gitorious.org/+xdg-specs > >> " > >> > >> A git repo is easy to move if we ever want that. > > > > Actually it's too easy to not move it once in a while :) > > Would be cool to also have integration with the issue tracker though. > > Does SF have this?
I was thinking about something like being able to reference patches by their hashes or something. So that a ticket resolution could link to the web interface showing the patch while still being able to move repositories around. The less convenient approach is to provide a patch hash and people would use a git gui to find it, but it's not as friendly to "light" contributors. So far I didn't manage to find such a functionality in SF. Quite possibly it doesn't exist in any of popular trackers :/ -- Evgeny _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
