В сообщении от Пятница 25 сентября 2009 20:07:51 автор Leo Sauermann написал: > It was Evgeny Egorochkin who said at the right time 25.09.2009 18:43 the > > following words: > > Basically I think the biggest concern here is interoperability between > > nao:Tag and pimo:Tag. > > > > How can applications that use nao:Tag and pimo:Tag "talk" to each other? > > let the same instance be both a nao:tag and a pimo:Tag. > > but our plan was: > * nao:Tag is piss-easy, we use it now to get KDE 4.0 off the ground (... > this we said in ~Oct 2006) > * pimo:Tag is way cooler because your things in live are tags. We should > update KDE for this (... uh....) > > so, it will take some time to get there. > > Sebastian Trüg actually worked on some ways to do this - I think. > > did you?
Basically since "cheap pimo:Thingification"[1] is agreed on in principle, I believe kde could move to using pimo:Tag anytime. [1] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/oscaf/ticket/45 > > В сообщении от Пятница 25 сентября 2009 19:30:58 автор Leo Sauermann написал: > >> as others may be interested in this discussion, I am also including > >> xesam (= the ontology developers list) > >> > >> I was a bit slow to answer, sorry. > >> > >> Tomás - what are you programming? do you have a url or a blogpost about > >> your work? > >> > >> nao:Tag is for systems that just use NAO/NIE and are fine with > >> no-brainer solutions. > >> a nao:Tag has the semantic meaning of : the tag is a string. its unique. > >> > >> pimo:Tag is for systems that want to achieve a highlevel integration of > >> Addressbooks, Calendars, Websites, etc... into a semantic network. > >> pimo:Tags are then not only tags, but can be also a pimo:Person - that > >> is, you can use a person's name to tag something but - surprise - it is > >> also a person. > >> now clicking on the person will get more... > >> a pimo:Tag has the semantic meaning of : the tag is a unique string > >> which is also a Thing out of the real world which can have more > >> attributes. > >> > >> I also documented this here in the FAQ > >> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/oscaf/wiki/PIMO/FAQ#Whatisthedifferenc > >>ebe tweennao:Tagandpimo:Tag > >> > >> best > >> Leo > >> > >> > >> > >> It was Tomás Vírseda who said at the right time 12.09.2009 23:50 the > >> > >> following words: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm confused about pimo:Tag and nao:Tag classes described in their > >>> respective ontology. Which is the difference between these two clases? > >>> I'm reading the ontologies documentation but I can't still figure out > >>> how they should be used. I'm developing a tagging system in a > >>> application and I would like to use Nepomuk. > >>> > >>> About pimo:Tag description: > >>> "Tags in the context of PIMO. A marker class for Things that are used > >>> to categorize documents (or other things). Tags must be a kind of > >>> Thing and must have a unique label. Documents should not be Tags by > >>> default." > >>> > >>> About nao:Tag description: > >>> "This class is useful for modelling conventional tagging practices. > >>> The user can tag resources in conventional ways, automatically > >>> creating an instance of this tag, which is then related to the > >>> annotated resource via the nao:hasTag property. For more on tagging as > >>> annotation see Section 2.3.". I've read this section and the > >>> explanation is very convincing. > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance. > >>> Kind regards > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tomás Vírseda > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> people mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.semanticdesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/people > _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
