Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Leo Sauermann <[email protected]>wrote:
> nao:Tag is for systems that just use NAO/NIE and are fine with > no-brainer solutions. > a nao:Tag has the semantic meaning of : the tag is a string. its unique. > > pimo:Tag is for systems that want to achieve a highlevel integration of > Addressbooks, Calendars, Websites, etc... into a semantic network. > pimo:Tags are then not only tags, but can be also a pimo:Person - that > is, you can use a person's name to tag something but - surprise - it is > also a person Out of curiosity: so "pimo:Tag" is then a generic "link" between two resources? It sounds like we could replace all properties between concepts (exclusing inheritance) as tags: "music piece belongs to an album" could be a Tag, Contact sent an email..." another tag, "Contact has postal address" another tag.... . > now clicking on the person will get more... > a pimo:Tag has the semantic meaning of : the tag is a unique string > which is also a Thing out of the real world which can have more attributes. > Then it is opening the door to all kind of "custom properties". A pimo:Tag is like a property between two things that the user can label... it sounds pretty dangerous. Regards,, Ivan
_______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
