Sam Putman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Herbert Schulz <he...@wideopenwest.com> wrote:

On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote:


Wilfred van Rooijen wrote:


As far as I remember, if you use memoir in the article emulation mode, the 
command \chapter works in the same way as \section in the article class.

Yes. But I misread Herb's remarks and thought he simply wanted to do away with 
the numbers altogether. Nevertheless, what I get with just the article option 
in memoir class is \chapter starts at 1. If you use a section command /before/ 
a chapter, then you'll probably get a 0.1 for it. Is that the problem?


Howdy,

The real article class doesn't have chapters at all; the hierarchy starts at 
sections.



Note that this is important behavior: an "article" is supposed to be
something you can embed, if you choose, as a "chapter" in a "book" and
everything should automatically work.

Memoir's manual says this about article emulation:

"article    typesetting simulates the article class, but the \chapter
command is not disabled. Chapters do not start a new page and chapter
headings are typeset like a section heading. The numbering of figures,
etc., is continuous and not per chapter. However, a \part command
still puts its heading on a page by itself."

To be honest, I'm not sure to what purpose this option is provided,
that is, what the use case is. If writing an article, labeling the
sections with the \chapter command can only cause problems later, if
one wants to then treat the article as a chapter.

The `use case' is that all too often I had started a document as an article and then had to change it to a report, and of course the other way, starting as a report and ending as an article. This meant that I had to keep on changing \section to \chapter, etc., or changing \chapter to \section, etc. I designed memoir so that I could/would always use \chapter and the article option would make it all look like an article without having to change anything in the body of the document.


Memoir is great but there's inevitable tradeoffs: by providing more
options, it's more complex, and one needs to get more used to issuing
commands like \setsecnumdepth directly to get the behavior desired.

Fortunately the manual is excellent!

Thank you
Peter W.


cheers,
-Sam.



--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex



--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
 http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to