Am Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:55:11 +0200 schrieb le.farfadet.spat...@free.fr:
>> Why don't you do it? > > Well, because then I do not know how to obtain bold italic font in > mathematical > environment, and because I am loosing Greek symbols. > > Actually, I am not more found about one package or another. The reason I > have > started to use Isomath is Bm does not work properly with Mathspec. For now on, > what I want is to be able to obtain bold italic font in mathematical > environments, including bold italic font for Greek symbols, with XeLaTeX, if > possible in a way that is compatible with LuaLaTeX. The main problem is that (at least my version of) the libertine fonts don't have a bold italic greek symbols. If the glyph would be in the font than this would work (^^^^03c4 is the ascii notation of the small tau): \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathspec} \setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text]{Linux Libertine O} \setmathfont(Digits,Latin,Greek){Linux Libertine O} % \makeatletter \normalfont \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathbfit}{\zf@enc}{\zf@family}{bx}{it} \makeatother \begin{document} ^^^^03c4 \itshape ^^^^03c4 \bfseries ^^^^03c4 \upshape ^^^^03c4 $^^^^03c4 \mathbfit{abcABC^^^^03c4}$ \end{document} The second problem is that as soon as you use \usepackage[math]{mathspec} together with \setmathfont you get a lot of errors like ! LaTeX Error: Command `\Gamma' already defined. At my opinion mathspec should sort this out. -- Ulrike Fischer -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex