If your bugfix is simple and without other (potential) side effects, then you 
can make a new version of the package incorporating your changes. Add a 
description of your changes to the source code, add a contact address, and make 
this new version available for everybody. Then upload the package to CTAN. That 
last step is the problem - I also don't know how to upload a package so that it 
is "registered" in CTAN. Perhaps someone else on this list can provide some 
more info.
Wilfred
 

    On Saturday, March 17, 2018 4:25 AM, Arash Zeini <arash.ze...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
 

 I don't have the necessary skills to maintain the code and I was not the one 
who came up with the modifications. I'd be more than happy to take care of the 
administrative side of things, if that's possible.
Best,Arash
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, 12:54 Wilfred van Rooijen, <wvanrooi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

You should "adopt" the package and become the new maintainer, perhaps.
Wilfred
 

    On Friday, March 16, 2018 7:33 PM, Arash Zeini <arash.ze...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
 

 Hi Everyone,

A couple of years ago, I raised an issue I had encountered with the arcs 
package (see below for the complete run of messages). A solution was proposed 
by Michael Sharpe and Joseph Wright wrote that he would mention the issue on 
c.t.t., as messages to arcs' author bounced. The solution, which I add manually 
to arcs.sty is:

"The arcs package depends on the relsize package which did change a few months 
ago in a way that requires a small change in the arcs package. You need to add 
the line (just after \RequirePackage{relsize} is a good place}

\long\def \@gobblethree #1#2#3{}

and then change the line

\let \rs@size@warning = \@gobbletwo

to

\let \rs@size@warning = \@gobblethree

because, in relsize.sty, the macro \rs@size@warning is now defined to have 
three arguments, the last of which (6.0pt) was being left as printable text. 
This problem is a LaTeX issue and has nothing particular to XeTeX."
The arcs package was never updated and the issue persists. Is there anyway 
these changes could be incorporated into arcs.sty? I use arcs quite often and 
it would be a great help if the changes could become part of the code.

Many thanks and best wishes,
Arash

On 26 August 2013 at 17:25, Arash Zeini <arash.ze...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you, all, for your feedback. I can wait for the fix to be applied.
Joseph: if you hear anything, could you please post it here?
Many thanks and best wishes,Arash

On 25 August 2013 16:02, Joseph Wright <joseph.wright@morningstar2. co.uk> 
wrote:

On 25/08/2013 16:00, Joseph Wright wrote:
> Nothing to do with XeTeX: it's due to relsize and shows up with a demo
> for pdfTeX. Inside arcs.sty you find
>
>     \let \rs@size@warning = \@gobbletwo
>     \relsize{-10}%
>
> but in the latest relsize (dated 2013-03-29) \rs@size@warning takes
> three arguments. Thus arcs needs adjusting (probaly should just leave
> the relsize code alone): I've CC'd the arcs author.

Message to the arcs author bounced. I'll raise this on c.t.t.: the
package is LPPL so a change can be sorted out if he can't be found.
--
Joseph Wright


------------------------------ --------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/ listinfo/xetex






--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex


   

--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex



   

--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to