Miguel and other RDD developers:
Apparently the gpf problem we're having in sharing rddads with the
Harbour project is because of the C Struct changes.
It's my understanding that all RDD WA structures need to match up to
a certain point, and then specific rdds can add properties afterwards.
In rddads.h we have:
USHORT uiFieldHidden;
in the middle of the _ADSAREA_ structure definition
so I have to presume that Harbour now has a different core structure than
xHarbour. Is that correct?
Did we make a decision on whether to keep RDD compatibility with what
Przemek and Viktor are doing over there? Did they handle hidden fields
differently than what you did, or did they just not handle that feature?
If the latter is true, I can try to convince them to bring in your changes
so we can keep this moving forward instead of backwards..
--
Brian Hays
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
