OK, then the current trunk is for 1.2.3 then, unless there is a different proposal.
Deal? Andi On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:28:19 +0200 "Patrick Mast, xHarbour" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Andi, > > > Very well! Thanks you. > ;-) > > > BTW, I notice that there are branches for 1.2.0, 1.2.1, and 1.2.2 (just > > now). So, what should we name the trunk version now? 1.2.3 ? > Yes, current trunk is to develop 1.2.3 OR 1.5 OR even 2.0. It is so long ago > since we had a new official release, so I'm even more in favour of a new 2.0 > later on ;-) > > > And if xharbour.org is to release official build, should it be a 1.2.2? > See above. > > > For me, the number is just for marking a cut-off. > haha, and I think its important ;-)) > > > Andi (rather confusing) > Current trunk is the development for a FUTURE release. How we call it is to > decide when we are at the point where we actually RELEASE. > > So, the only thing changed now is that we have a "backup" of current state in > branche-1-2-2 and we can all continue develop in current trunk. > > Patrick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
