Deal!! ;-) On 29 Sep 2012, at 12:27, Andi Jahja <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, then the current trunk is for 1.2.3 then, unless there is a > different proposal. > > Deal? > > Andi > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:28:19 +0200 > "Patrick Mast, xHarbour" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Andi, >> >>> Very well! Thanks you. >> ;-) >> >>> BTW, I notice that there are branches for 1.2.0, 1.2.1, and 1.2.2 (just >>> now). So, what should we name the trunk version now? 1.2.3 ? >> Yes, current trunk is to develop 1.2.3 OR 1.5 OR even 2.0. It is so long ago >> since we had a new official release, so I'm even more in favour of a new 2.0 >> later on ;-) >> >>> And if xharbour.org is to release official build, should it be a 1.2.2? >> See above. >> >>> For me, the number is just for marking a cut-off. >> haha, and I think its important ;-)) >> >>> Andi (rather confusing) >> Current trunk is the development for a FUTURE release. How we call it is to >> decide when we are at the point where we actually RELEASE. >> >> So, the only thing changed now is that we have a "backup" of current state >> in branche-1-2-2 and we can all continue develop in current trunk. >> >> Patrick > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
