Are there any performance issues associated with the binary format?
JAn
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Joseph A. Mallett wrote:
> Apple's patches to GCC add mach-o support, and since it's GCC it's GPL,
> which is a moot point to us, since we'll be using GCC Anyway.
>
> /joseph
>
> --
> [ Joseph Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] [ http://srcsys.org ]
> [ xMach Core Team xMach: Proactively Unbloated Microkernel BSD ]
> [ FreeBSD, NetBSD, & xMach User; (Obj)C(++) Coder ] [ http://xMach.org ]
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS d-- s+:++ a--- C+++ UB++++ P+++ L- E---- W++ N+ o-- K- w++
> O M+ V PS+ PE- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- X+ R tv- b++ DI+ D---
> G e* h! r% z+
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
> On Sat, 26 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Well, development tool support is important. Is mach-o supported?
> >
> > JAn
> >
> > On Sat, 26 May 2001, DraX wrote:
> >
> > > Because RMS told them that some how somewhere it would POSSIBLY impede
> > > RMSism.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
