> No, because the cost of opening a connection is 0.0 compared with the cost > of actually sending the data. If the server is local and you do not > transfer any data ( you only send the path name ) the cost of opening a > connection is still 0.0 for local ones ( and also compared to the time it > takes to filter ). >
Well, there is still the issue of having a mechanism to simply open a socket, pass the parameters to another daemon without sending the actual message. The other daemon would have to have read/write permissions to look at and alter any messages, but it still seems to me that it is easier than constantly marshalling resources from a commandline prompt each time. This approach would still benefit both Scope and JScope.. Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
