Personally, I like the idea of two -- adds much more control. Shawn=20
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = On Behalf Of Charles Frolick Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because as soon as it is global, you will have someone with a very good reason to make two :) Other than that, at the moment I can't think of one. Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:27 PM To: XMail mailing list Subject: [xmail] Filter poll ... Right now the "break" filter return flag makes XMail to exit from the current .tab loop, but not from the filter.{in,out}.tab one. If someone = does not give me a very good reason to have two break flags (one to exit from = the current .tab and one from the filter.{in,out}.tab one) I'm going to = convert the local break flag to a global one. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the = body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the = body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
