I think 'complaining'  and 'suggesting'  are getting confused here.

And personally I don't want to use anything else but I think it is in
the interest of everyone to have better documentation. Volunteers would
be needed to do that.

=20

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Benny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 17:37
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
>=20
> Complainers,
>=20
>   I do not usually get into these debates, but I know how=20
> hard it is developing little pieces of software here and=20
> there.  So I can only imagine how much Davide has on his=20
> plate.  Davide has never said, don't write documentation.  If=20
> you are going to use opensource, than you have to understand=20
> what opensource involves.  This is not MySQL, that has=20
> developers up the wazzu.  This is ONE man, with contributors=20
> for any other code/projects.  IF you have ever gone to=20
> xmailserver.org(sarcasm), you would notice that all of=20
> contributors links and documentation on the site.  On top of=20
> it all, this list is very supportive.  I haven't ran into one=20
> issue that hasn't been solved in this list.  I also think=20
> it's incredibly rude to assume that Davide is not listening=20
> to other peoples ideas and what they want.  Do you think that=20
> everything in XMail is only stuff that Davide wants, and he=20
> hasn't made ANY code for the user?=20
>=20
> I am going to end with this... Davide is the maintainer of=20
> XMail, if you don't like it, than you don't have to use it. =20
> Write your own mail server, or go use sendmail, qmail or=20
> something... than you can complain to whomever.  Take the=20
> XMail code and add all you want to it, than release your own=20
> opensource project.  Who knows, maybe Davide will thank you=20
> for getting all the complainers off his back hahaha.
>=20
> Alright, I am done ranting.
>=20
> ben
>=20
>=20
> Matic wrote:
>=20
> >Davide doesn't hate documentation but the users who DON'T=20
> READ IT. He=20
> >just want to make it as simple as possible. Besides, he=20
> already stated=20
> >that he changed his opinion regarding this issue, so now would be a=20
> >realy good time to close this thread and let the MAN work -=20
> what he does best.
> >
> >Matic
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Wim Verveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:51 PM
> >Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
> >
> >
> > =20
> >
> >>If open source just means ' please shut up'  than closed=20
> source would=20
> >>be a much better alternative. I think that as a maintainer=20
> you should=20
> >>listen to the people using the software. This does not mean doing=20
> >>everything what people ask but listening. If there are things which=20
> >>the maintainer does not want to do he might delegate it to other=20
> >>people. As far as I can see Davide hates documentation. But that's=20
> >>okay, you should however in that case let other people do=20
> that job. In=20
> >>the end we might end up with both a good product AND good=20
> >>documentation. A win win situation so to say
> >>
> >>Wim
> >>
> >>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >>Van: Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 15:54
> >>Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
> >>
> >>
> >>I guess I'm not trying to stifle it, but like everyone=20
> here, I have my=20
> >>=3D =3D3D opinions.
> >>
> >>I do have to ask how many times does Davide have to say "no" before=20
> >>people =3D3D realize that he's not going to make the change? =20
> People may=20
> >>=3D not be being =3D3D ungrateful, but beating this dead horse=20
> isn't going=20
> >>to make him change it. =3D3D  It's HIS software (so his=20
> decision), yes=20
> >>it's open source, but that =3D3D doesn't change the fact that=20
> he's the=20
> >>writer/maintainer.  Open source also =3D3D allowsfor people to =
change=20
> >>the code any way they see fit, including the =3D3D defaults for the=20
> >>smtprelay.tab file.
> >>
> >>If you're not happy with it change it, isn't THAT the=20
> beauty of open=20
> >>=3D3D source?
> >>
> >>If you think the documentation isn't up to snuff, write a howto.
> >>There's =3D3D one person on this list that writes a great "Beginners =

> >>Guide to..." and =3D3D even he says to change it.  It all=20
> comes down to=20
> >>the fact that you can =3D3D write it in 72 point text and=20
> people still won't RTFM.
> >>
> >>Dale
> >>
> >>   =20
> >>
> >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/31/04 10:47PM >>>
> >>>>>         =20
> >>>>>
> >>On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 12:59, Dale Qualls wrote:
> >>   =20
> >>
> >>>Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned=3D20=20
> >>>smtprelay.t=3D3D
> >>>     =20
> >>>
> >>ab=3D3D3D
> >>   =20
> >>
> >>> file?
> >>>     =20
> >>>
> >>no - but I agree it's easy to miss.  Even if it was left the way it=20
> >>was and there was a file named "IMPORTANT.txt" in the root=20
> directory=20
> >>of the archive that would suffice IMHO.  I have always thought a=20
> >>little more documentation (or a little more well targeted=20
> >>documentation) was appropriate.
> >>
> >>   =20
> >>
> >>>I'm amazed at everyone bitching over a great product that no one=20
> >>>pays=3D20 =3D3D
> >>>     =20
> >>>
> >>any =3D3D3D
> >>   =20
> >>
> >>>money for.
> >>>     =20
> >>>
> >>Yeah this is how software improves isn't it, by everyone=20
> keeping their=20
> >>mouths shut.  Nobody is being ungrateful, we are just=20
> raising issues=20
> >>and offering solutions.
> >>
> >>I would rather have people email me their concerns about=20
> the software=20
> >>I develop than not finding out about them till months later.
> >>
> >>This is the beauty of open source - the ability to actually=20
> have your=20
> >>feedback listened to and acted on.  Why you are trying to=20
> stifle this=20
> >>valid conversation I do not know.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>Will.
> >>
> >>--=3D3D20
> >>William Denniss - will@ http://tanksoftware.com/=3D3D20
> >>
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in=20
> >>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general=20
> >>help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to=20
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in=20
> >>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help:=20
> >>send the line "help" in the body of a message to=20
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in=20
> >>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help:=20
> >>send the line "help" in the body of a message to=20
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>   =20
> >>
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe=20
> xmail" in the=20
> >body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general=20
> help: send the=20
> >line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > =20
> >
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe=20
> xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a=20
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to