We all (should) know that no one single tool will prevent all spam from reaching our mailboxes. Each tool targets specific ways of fighting spam. The most effective ways to prevent spam include using more than one tool.
SPF is very simple to set up and use compared to "packages" like SpamAssassin, and IMHO is very effective in the area of spam it targets. It requires very low resources and is on it's way to becoming an RFC (or is it already?). I say "why not?". I personally use SpamAssassin as well as SPF, and I can attest to the fact that they complement each other. XMail's existing spam prevention features round out the package. It may not be an enterprise-level solution, but I have very few users and I can't remember the last time any spam reached my mailbox. That's my $0.02. Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Nick Marino wrote: > > >>Why do you say that? >> >>Can we have your PRO's and CON's of your expreience with it so far? >> >>I am using it also and would really like to know how you feel about using >>it. > > > I am using it thru the filter and I dropped SPF record in my DNS. But I do > not see too many ppl embracing it. > > > - Davide > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
