On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Davide Libenzi wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Stephan Müller wrote:
> 
> > On 17.12.2009, Davide Libenzi <davi...@xmailserver.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am starting to use xmail on an embedded system based on ARM. Due to 
> > > > the
> > > > limited space available, I had to make IPv6 and SSL support a compile
> > > > time option.
> > > >
> > > > Essentially, I added a bunch of ifdefs around the problematic code. 
> > > > There
> > > > are not that many though.
> > > >
> > > > Do you want to have these patches?
> > > 
> > > I will not merge them, but you can send them in if you like. Better yet,
> > > is if you post a link, which I can add to the XMail home page.
> > > Keep in mind though, that the new random tmp file name generation is based
> > > in part upon RAND_pseudo_bytes(), which is part of OpenSSL.
> > 
> > Hm, is it possible to refrain from OpenSSL?
> > 
> > The best solution IMHO (because it uses an atomic operation) is mkdir.
> > 
> > 1. register signal handler for signals 0, 1, 2, 3, 15 which removes 
> > /tmp/xmail
> > 
> > 2. mkdir(/tmp/xmail) with permissions 755 at the startup of xmail
> > 
> > 3. return /tmp/xmail/<sometmpfile> during the operation of xmail
> 
> It'd be possible something similar, yes. But this will need to be 
> optional, since existing configs cannot be broken.
> So a stronger temp file names generation is still necessary for legacy 
> systems.
> You can patch-out the call in your code if you like, or provide a trivial 
> rand()-based implementation.

I made the XMail temp directory on Unix configurable via an 'XMAIL_TEMP' 
environment variable, defaulting to '/tmp'.
So the user can set XMAIL_TEMP to whatever they like, and set the 
owner/permissions accordingly (which should be taken care also when 
running filters).



- Davide

_______________________________________________
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail

Reply via email to