I agree, put it :-) Ben Saylor wrote: > Or just make a (non-autoconf) script named "configure" that will > generate a makefile based on options given on the command line or > interactively. > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 05:58:13PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > >>>anyways, is there any reason why Xmame doesn't use GNU automake? >>> >>automake can make things very unportable (e.g. it seems too get quite >>upset when it encunters systems that dont have 'uname'). The current >>"edit the makefile" scenario is not ideal for a first time user though, >>maybe we should supply some default configs ? >> >>-bat. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Xmame mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame >> > > _______________________________________________ > Xmame mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame > >
_______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
