----- Original Message ----- From: "Pieter Hulshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [Xmame] speed: xmame vs mame32 - Bingo!
On Monday 18 November 2002 07:15, Fogle Cpl Shawn B wrote: > > Did you uncomment > > > > X86_ASM_68000 = 1 > > X11_MITSHM = 1 > I had the second one, not the first one. My testgame was gradius2, which now > that I've recompiled with the first option uncommented as well runs very well > indeed! Scaling left something to be desired, but I'll try xv and other > options to see how it performs. Also, the suggestion to add a few lines to my > x configuration will be given a try as well. MAME32 is always compiled with that first option, so yes, now it's fair to compare the two. _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
