On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:49:55AM -0600, Mark Nipper wrote: > There is no point in following the party line when that > means holding back progress in certain areas just because the > party line's choice of operating systems is limited.
What makes you think all mamedev uses windows ? And did you ever hear about "not biting the hand that feeds you" ? > Not to say > that running mame under win32 as a screensaver is impossible, but > I doubt it's already been implemented. Under xmame, the feature > is 99.9% there and only really lacks (officially) the > skip_warnings option. That's bullshit. You have options.skip_warning accessible from the osd, just not from the .ini. Nothing prevents you from toggling it from the osd when you detect you're started from xscreensaver. > Besides, if the default is off, I cannot see where this > is a problem. As OSS, aren't we about enabling the user as > opposed to crippling them? Pay no attention; these are not the > droids you are looking for. :) Mame is neither free software nor open source. OG. _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
