Hi Marshal,
Marshall Shapiro wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't realize there was an embedded database. Instead, I
thought if I hadn't configured a database, you saved things in files. My
mistake. So, yes I am using the default embedded database.
As a side question to my larger client problem, will I see a performance
change if I go to postgres?
Yes you will, but not for the better. HSQLDB has been shown to be faster
than any other database but I don't know how good it is when it comes to
large amount of data, that's why we don't usually recomend it as the DB
to use for productional systems.
Regards
Michele
Marshall
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcel Ruff
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 4:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [xmlblaster] client stops receiving messages
Marshall Shapiro wrote:
Marcel,
The session is not persistent. Neither are the subscriptions. (I believe)
the messages are also not persistent. Most have a very short lifetime. (The
idea is to deliver to those listening and get rid of it). (I didn't
implement all the clients so I can't be 100% sure that no client is
mistakenly publishing persistent messages, but I don't think so).
I'm not using a database, just flat files for storage. Is that a problem?
You have configured the default HSQL DB for persistency?:
StoragePlugin[JDBC][1.0]=${JdbcStorage[HSQLDatabaseEngine]}
QueuePlugin[JDBC][1.0]=${JdbcStorage[HSQLDatabaseEngine]}
What do you store in flat files?
