Hi Roumen, On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Roumen Petrov <xml...@roumenpetrov.info> wrote: > No this is not correct reference. > > See rfc4050 "Using the Elliptic Curve Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for XML > Digital Signatures", chapter > > 3.3. ECDSA Signatures
Aha! I wasn't aware of that newer RFC, specific to xmldsig. > Does xmlsec follow RFC ? Currently it does; my proposed <https://github.com/lsh123/xmlsec/pull/90> would change this, but sure, looks like that should not be merged after all. Regards, Miklos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list xmlsec@aleksey.com http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
