Yeah, here it is exactly: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4050#section-3.3
I think the current code is correct. Aleksey On 3/4/17 4:46 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi Roumen, > > On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Roumen Petrov > <xml...@roumenpetrov.info> wrote: >> No this is not correct reference. >> >> See rfc4050 "Using the Elliptic Curve Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for XML >> Digital Signatures", chapter >> >> 3.3. ECDSA Signatures > > Aha! I wasn't aware of that newer RFC, specific to xmldsig. > >> Does xmlsec follow RFC ? > > Currently it does; my proposed > <https://github.com/lsh123/xmlsec/pull/90> would change this, but sure, > looks like that should not be merged after all. > > Regards, > > Miklos > > > > _______________________________________________ > xmlsec mailing list > xmlsec@aleksey.com > http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list xmlsec@aleksey.com http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
