On Sun, 2 May 2010 09:11:53 -0700, Jamey Sharp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Would you agree to revert the ptrveloc.* part of the patch? I'd rather > > fix this when fixing the accel setup. The scheme stuff isn't fully > > worked out, but the props really belong there. Feel free to use a union or some other datatype, but I don't see why DIX would need to use a devPrivate for internal operation. Or even just separate pointers; storage is not a significant issue for devices, and avoiding devPrivates means that the code can be simpler and clearer. And, it's never too late to go back to the old code if that seems sensible. -- [email protected]
pgptaVRDNbd5M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
