Am 02.05.2010 22:50, schrieb Keith Packard: > On Sun, 2 May 2010 09:11:53 -0700, Jamey Sharp <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Would you agree to revert the ptrveloc.* part of the patch? I'd rather >>> fix this when fixing the accel setup. The scheme stuff isn't fully >>> worked out, but the props really belong there. > > Feel free to use a union or some other datatype, but I don't see why DIX > would need to use a devPrivate for internal operation. Or even just > separate pointers; storage is not a significant issue for devices, and > avoiding devPrivates means that the code can be simpler and clearer. > > And, it's never too late to go back to the old code if that seems sensible. I think I'll be preparing something on top of that, but it won't land tomorrow.
Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
