Hi, Julien Cristau wrote: > What did you test exactly?
I know this question was not directed to me, but can comment on builds for Microsoft Windows. AFAIK no compilers for Microsoft Windows can cope properly with weak definitions (like those in libXfont). There is a lot of discussion on this on the internet, but the line-of-least-resistance, is static build libXfont for the xserver. In my case (Xming) I therefore don't make a DLL from libXfont and put up with binary size increase when the library is linked elsewhere. My patch may therefore affect other Cygwin/X uses of libXfont but what else needs serverGeneration other than the xserver? Fixing the xserver build for Cygwin/X should be the top priority and my patch does that (but the Cygwin/X builders may disagree?) Thanks, Colin Harrison _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
