On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:58:21 +0100, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote:
> Mm, there's a lot in xcompmgr that makes it a great example of how not > to design a compositing manager. Unless you don't care in the least > about efficiency or aesthetics (which is sort of the point of a > compmgr). xcompmgr was written purely as a way of testing the Composite extension, it was never 'designed'. A nice, simple, xcb-based demo compositing manager would be a useful replacement (something that just does compositing, without any special effects). I found the hardest part to be tracking the X stacking order without ever calling XQueryTree. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpjZs0D5vvJ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
