On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:40:18AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Son, 2011-01-16 at 12:27 +0100, Dirk Wallenstein wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:26:10AM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > > > If type readBuf is char, then scanchar() return -1 for char(0xFF) and EOF. > > > If type readBuf is unsigned char, then scanchar() return 0xFF for > > > char(0xFF) > > > and -1 for EOF. > > > > NAK: I assume you want to correct the case when returning EOF stored > > inside of readBuf? This would now return EOF as 0x00ff but EOF is a > > negative value. All parts that access readBuf work with signed values. > > FYI, 'char' on its own may be signed or unsigned depending on the > implementation.
Ah, I remember (and the gcc options to enforce one). Thanks. -- Greetings, Dirk _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
