On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:27:30PM +0100, Dirk Wallenstein wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:26:10AM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > > If type readBuf is char, then scanchar() return -1 for char(0xFF) and EOF. > > If type readBuf is unsigned char, then scanchar() return 0xFF for char(0xFF) > > and -1 for EOF. > > NAK: I assume you want to correct the case when returning EOF stored > inside of readBuf? This would now return EOF as 0x00ff but EOF is a > negative value. All parts that access readBuf work with signed values.
Just in case scanchar() won't get reverted. This was a misunderstanding and next time I simply ask. I guess I meant "Now A Kwestion". Sorry for the noise. -- Greetings, Dirk _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
