Hi, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:14:26PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > Do we need more formal rules for merging code? The RandR 1.4 server code > was merged before the protocol and library APIs had seen sufficient > review, but we don't have a formal process for either of those > modules. Anyone know how to help with that? -- We don't have an official > protocol tree maintainer at this point, although Daniel Stone did > volunteer to put together another proposal for merging those trees > together, and if that happened, maybe we could convince him to run a > couple of cycles as release manager.
Yeah, that got caught up in unexpected holiday and/or moving continents; by the time I'd got to it, I'd missed the feature freeze for 1.10, so just shuffled it down my TODO list and moved on. I could try again for 1.11, and am happy to maintain it. I described my rough plan here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-September/013145.html Feedback/encouragement/discouragement welcome. Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
