Hi, On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:37:31PM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > > Yeah, that got caught up in unexpected holiday and/or moving continents; > > by the time I'd got to it, I'd missed the feature freeze for 1.10, so > > just shuffled it down my TODO list and moved on. I could try again for > > 1.11, and am happy to maintain it. > > > > I described my rough plan here: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-September/013145.html > > > > Feedback/encouragement/discouragement welcome. > > I'm not opposed to this in any way, but I'd like to make sure that the > transition be smooth for downstream. It's all the same files, so it > should be possible to version things intelligently so that modules > depending directly on the protocol headers don't see any difference. > Mostly this should be handling of pkg-config files, but I haven't > given it a lot of thought yet. Just want to make sure it's on your > radar before releases are made.
Yep, for sure. I'm not going to break backwards compatibility (at least, not intentionally, heh). Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
