On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:12:16PM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > This module is hosted as an X.Org app and is published as such. > This patch adds some missing packaging files and sets some basic > infrastructure > common to all xorg modules which saves maintenance in the long run. > > http://www.x.org/wiki/NewModuleGuidelines > > This series applies some xorg project policies and code reuse from > util-macros. > In some cases it reverts "upgrades" that were "too new" for the overall xorg. > There were no bug fixes, things went smoothly. > > All the changes done are generic and have been applied/reviewed to all xorg > modules. > Should there be any reasons to deviate, I'd be happy to make appropriate > adjustements > and comments. > > Gaetan Nadon (10): > Add mandatory COPYING file. > Use standard .gitignore file and layout > Man pages still showing version 1.0 in the 1.1 release > Add mandatory ChangeLog and INSTALL files > config: remove unrequired AM_PROG_CC_C_O > config: remove duplicate AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG__CC_99 > config: use project wide xorg warnings variable > config: set-up xorg automatic rebuilding rules > config: the minimum version for autoconf is 2.60 > config: restore the libtool minimum version to 1.5
Applied and pushed, thanks for the patches. While I have the attention of someone versed in buildsystem-fu: intel-gpu-tools also contains a set of tests for the i915 kernel module (and the libdrm interface for it). Currently we run them with $ make test by abusing the automake test rig. Is this ok or is there a better way to do something like this? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
