On 01/04/2012 08:39 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 01/04/12 06:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Originally we've abused make check, but that turned out to be a bad
idea because make distcheck automatically runs that. And the tests
check the kernel and not intel-gpu-tools itself, so that didn't make
much sense. Hence we added make test with a quick hack to run make
check with a different set of tests (see the test: target in
tests/Makefile.am).
Right - make check doesn't make sense because you don't want distcheck
to fail when your kernel driver has a bug, and because many of us build
our packages on servers without Intel graphics devices installed.
This is the same 'make check' that the tinderbox uses right?
Thread: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-January/028225.html
Forgive me if I'm being dumb here. My thought, on pretty much no sleep
last night, is should tinderbox be using make test instead of, or in
addition to, make check?
Matt
One thing I'm wondering is whether we could easily ship these tests in
some form, so that users could run them from the distro package
instead of grabbing the sources.
Should distros just be shipping the entire intel-gpu-tools package,
including the tests?
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
