Hi, On 9 March 2012 22:47, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:56:52 -0800, Alan Coopersmith > <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote: >> Are you going to pull in Daniel's code style change now? Of all the -next >> candidates from the last few months, that was the biggest I remember. > > Yes, that needs to happen now or not at all. It will make back-porting > fixes painful for a while, but the alternative is to forever live with > the existing mish-mash of coding styles. > > Daniel: do you want to re-spin the patch for 1.12 now? iirc, it was just > a purely mechanical operation, right?
I've revived this and put the result (for now) into people.fd.o/~daniels/xserver:coding-style, but indent is prone to doing some moderately insane things, so I've been going through the results one-by-one (ugh) over the past couple of nights and fixing up what's broken. If time is of the essence I could push this now and then push series of smaller fixup commits later. > The testing I did last time was to compare the emitted instruction > sequences for every file compiled for my environment. Ooh right, I'll do that too. Have you got the exact commands you used? Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel