Am 13.11.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Keith Packard: > Uli Schlachter <psyc...@znc.in> writes: > >> If "something" uses xcb (even just sending a request is enough, doesn't have >> to >> be waiting for a reply), xcb could read an event from its FD and append it to >> its internal queue. At this point there is a pending event in the queue, but >> the >> socket isn't marked readable. With this change, the event won't be removed >> from >> the queue. > > So, if we check for events before going to sleep (in the block handler), > that should be sufficient to catch this I think? >
Yup. If I understand the code correctly, that's exactly what the "old" code does. -- Who needs a ~/.signature anyway? _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
