Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> writes: > this is a behaviour change, was this intended? I'd rather not have this > hidden in a giant patch that is otherwise mostly search and replace.
Ok, I've pushed out a new series which creates a recursive (counting)
mutex that makes all of this stuff quite easy. Nice to have only two
threads, and to not be worrying about performance here. In particular, I
didn't have to move locks around, except for one case where the existing
code looked like it wasn't locking enough. That's a separate patch.
I'll send the updated series to the list; it's also in my git repository
at:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver.git input-thread
This also removes the (controversial) DRI1 changes from this series;
they're tacked ontop of the fd_set patches in my remove-xfree86-sigio
branch.
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
