Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> writes: > Does this imply that XDMCP users don't deserve accessibility, since we > can't get a peer gid from a TCP socket? Seems suboptimal.
Without additional work, you would have to choose between security or functionality. With a little work, one can imagine using the SECURITY extension to construct a new authorization token that would be used to limit access to the extensions needed for accessibility. Getting that integrated into the desktop environment will take more work than the simple GID-based access control I proposed, but it's all feasible. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
